Feeding Frenzy Beer

For a beer geek, knowing beer – really knowing beer – is one of the greatest joys in the world. Some may scoff at the idea of acquiring knowledge about beer, but when one considers how vast the beer universe is, beer knowledge is a true accomplishment. Archaeo-anthropologists have found evidence of beer tracing back ten thousand years. Ancient carvings and pictographs in stone walls detail the goddesses who gave them beer. Some demonstrate how the royal families drank it, while others detail ceremonies surrounding it.
Laws governing beer endeavored to control economies within countries, and were implemented to funnel wealth toward, and away from, religious communities. Beer laws did not just come about in modern times, but have been around for hundreds of years. Some forbade the use of hops; others forbade the use of gruit; still others stipulated barley as a necessary ingredient, with exceptions made for the king. He was regularly presented with wheat beer, even though wheat was in short supply and provided bread for the masses.
Included in beer knowledge is the vast field of brewing. Ingredients, sensory perception, or conditions which induce off-flavors are important pieces of the puzzle that come together in the final product. Great discoveries have been made by scientists regarding yeast, water, and agricultural products – all because of beer. Historical figures have built fortunes with beer, while breweries throughout Europe were cannibalized by the affects of war. Beer’s history goes on and on in a fascinating litany of the human condition.
How strong is your beer knowledge? Are you well-versed enough to write beer trivia questions? Ask those who have competed in the annual Philly Beer Geek competition. Before a panel of seven or eight illustrious judges, each finalist is challenged with a segment called “Stump the Chumps.” Each chooses a judge and asks him, or her, a beer-related question, with the intention of stumping the bench. The judge can answer the question or call upon one other judge to assist. The judges on the panel evaluate the question for accuracy and level of difficulty. Some questions are truly brilliant; others are not well researched or have multiple answers that the finalist did not explore. Bazzinga! A beer geek exposed!
Here are nine beer questions to feed your frenzy for knowledge:
Q. Although it was unusual for a woman to take pen-in-hand at the time, this figure is credited with authoring Physica Sacra, circa 1150 CE, and documenting the use of hops in beer. It may be the earliest record of such a practice. Who is this woman?
A. Abbess Hildegard of Bingen
Q. What ingredients are used in the fermentation of sake?
A. Koji and Sake yeast
Q. When was the “Great Molasses Flood” in Boston, Massachusetts?
A. January 13, 1919
Q. In that Great Molasses Flood, the massive storage tank that burst was filled with two and a half million gallons of molasses. What company was responsible for its construction?
A. Purity Distilling Company
Q. How many gallons does a keg hold?
A. 15.5 gallons
Q. There are eight different tapping systems in use today. Name four of those systems.
A. Any four of these: The American D system – most North American beers use this coupler; The European S system – many Import beers use this system; A system – the German slider; M system – recent to the US market, this system has the same body as the A system, but uses a different probe; G system – Grundy system; U system – named after the English manufacturer UEC, and used by Guinness and Harp; Twin Probe – used by some craft breweries; Home Brew – has ball lock fittings for homebrew tanks.
Q. What program was founded in 2007 as the brainchild of Ray Daniels, author of Designing Great Beers? This program was created to “ensure that consumers receive the best possible beer and enjoy its flavors to the greatest extent possible.”
A. The Cicerone Certification Program
Q. From what country do Fuggles and East Kent Goldings commonly hail?
A. England
Q. Are all beers vegan friendly?
A. No. They may be filtered with gelatin and casein as clarifying agents or they may be fined using Isinglass, made from the dried swim bladders of tropical fish. They may also use foam-control agents such as glycerin, made from animal and vegetable fats, and glyceryl monostearate, derived from natural stearic acid and glycerin. Lastly, if a beer is experimental in nature, it may have special ingredients such as bull testicles or goat brains to grab the attention of the market.
Cheers!


You Should Also Read:
Beer & Molasses History - The Great Molasses Flood of 1919
Yeast Wranglers
Kopi Luwak in the Brew Kettle
Related Articles
Editor's Picks Articles
Top Ten Articles
Previous Features
Site Map
Content copyright © 2019 by Carolyn Smagalski. All rights reserved.
This content was written by Carolyn Smagalski. If you wish to use this content in any manner, you need written permission. Contact Carolyn Smagalski for details.

Jul 11, 2016  Witness a day in the life of meal time for these bear cubs at the Orphan Bear Rehabilitation Center (OBRC). These people are saving the lives of these orphaned bear cubs so that they can. As the name suggests, the Moultrie Pro Hunter Hanging Deer Feeder has a capacity of thirty gallons in the feeding barrel, which equates to approximately two hundred pounds. Two hundred pounds of feed will be enough for at least four months of feeding, or a good full hunting season. Feb 29, 2020  Corona beer sales are supposedly down. Big Pharma comes up with a vaccine the social media malcontents will descend on them like a school of piranhas in a feeding frenzy.

Beer Tools
Write a Review
Beer Geek Stats: | Print Shelf Talker
Style:
American Imperial IPA
Ranked #2,116
ABV:
8%
Score:
90
Ranked #13,880
Avg:
4.09 | pDev: 10.76%
Reviews:
8
Ratings:
19
From:
Copperhead Brewery
Texas, United States
Avail:
Rotating
Wants
0
Gots
6
Reviews: 8| Ratings: 19| Log in to view all ratings and sort
2.88/5 rDev -29.6%
look: 1.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75
On tap at Drink of Ages Pub in Houston, TX. This is a so called New England IPA, I guess not what the brewery calls it but essentially it is.
A: Pours soupy, murky, pale yellow, opaque with what looks like fibrous protein. A small white head forms and recedes in a second with no lace. Looks unfinished to say the least...but I guess everything else is what matters right, I mean if a brewery makes something that looks like pale puke that is all the rage, so why not?
S: Grapefruit juice and a bit of bitterness. Nothing else, I mean put a bottle of Ruby Red and there you go.
T: Like the nose grapefruit juice. Which all finishes quickly. With some bitterness, some Ruby Red, and that is about all I get, which eventually becomes astringent.
M/O: A medium body with low carbonation. Up front is murky and muddled, with no real definition. No finish at all. Considering everything, it is surprisingly simple to drink and to enjoy somewhat if you like straight up grapefruit juice. Though not something I am coming back to often, even if I had the chance.
This screams of a brewery jumping on the most recent trends. Even if people like the overall 'product', there is no way this brewery would have made something like this without the ridiculous hype associated with the so called style. Getting past that, this is just really one noted and people would be better off just buying juice from the store.
1,422 characters
More User Reviews:
4.13/5 rDev +1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
3.98/5 rDev -2.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
4.33/5 rDev +5.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5
Ooo, baby. The lower rated review...the first review, I think, was way off...and hommie, obviously, does not know Copperhead Brewing...not so trendy!
151 characters
4.14/5 rDev +1.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25
4.23/5 rDev +3.4%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25
4.32/5 rDev +5.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.5
4.59/5 rDev +12.2%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5
I'm not an expert on NEIPAs. I don't chase the ones that are considered amazing. Just not what I'm into. I am into trying as much local craft as I can. This beer is really good. Smells great and the taste is on the nose. Citrusy. I'm a fan of IPAs that are more citrus than grassy or dank. This beer hits that mark.
Keep it up Copperhead. I'll drink more.
357 characters
4/5 rDev -2.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
4.3/5 rDev +5.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25
Pours a cloudy golden color with a thin foamy head. Head retention is very mild. Lacing is decent. Big fresh piney citrus aroma. Juicy citrus taste. The bitterness is a bit dialed down but still hoppy. Light to medium bodied with moderate carbonation.
251 characters
3.82/5 rDev -6.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75
4.25/5 rDev +3.9%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25
3.75/5 rDev -8.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
3.91/5 rDev -4.4%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.75
The negative review, while I get where it's coming from, is unfair. Clearly the reviewer has something against the NE IPA style and that effected the review and is not a good indication of what this beer is actually like...
Poured from a 32oz growler into a spiegelau. Super turbid and hazy appearance although lacks any real lacing. Aroma is amazing... straight up candy tropical fruit flavors, think liquid Starburst, although after pouring it fades quickly. Taste only follows through on some of the nose, but is pretty satisfying overall.
Mouthfeel is soft, but astringent hop bitterness and burn definitely lingers. Feels a bit raw. One of the best recent TX attempts at a NEIPA.
687 characters
3.8/5 rDev -7.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
Appearance - Pours copper color with not much of a head thin white ring around the glass.
Aroma - Mostly some light citrus aromas orange, and tangerine. Has sort of a sweet aroma.
Taste - Pretty mild orange flavors mild malt flavors with a touch of hops.
Feel - Medium bodied well carbonated
Overall - A decent IPA I will say you do not pick up much alcohol.
364 characters
4.33/5 rDev +5.9%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25
Poured from crowler, filled two days prior. Appearance is opaque, orange-amber in color. Relatively weak and but still aromatic, fruity and herbaceous. Taste is tropical fruit. Soft feel, so nice. Overall an excellent beer. Very impressive for the first(?) hazy IPA from Copperhead. If this is a 'recent trend', I hope it continues. UPDATED 7/06/17: Poured from 12 oz cans. The most recent version has lost much of the soft, chewy mouthfeel, and with it much of the haziness. Still a fruity IPA, excellent for an 8% abv. But missing the original recipe.
553 characters
Feeding Frenzy Beer
4.79/5 rDev +17.1%
look: 4.75 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4.75 | overall: 4.75
Join the frenzy! Feeding Frenzy has a great profile jam-packed with a heavy flavor. They've got something special here. It pours a hazy shade of orange, on the nose you get a sharp hit of citrus and the taste is absolutely phenomenal with a huge punch of orange juice. Surprised to see this not rated higher and especially that someone gave it under 3 stars. If you're (obviously) not a fan of the style, I don't think you should rate the product.
447 characters
4.44/5 rDev +8.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5
3.16/5 rDev -22.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Comments are closed.